Flow by Vincent Gallegos

« Back to Design Notes + Photos

 
Filed under

government 2.0

 

Andrea DiMaio: What About Crowdsourced Data? What Open Government Directive Leaves Out

  • How will agencies know whether open data are being used to the benefit of citizens unless employees can engage in external communities (i.e. communities that citizens themselves establish using their social media of choice?).
  • How will real participation be possible unless agencies recognize that data is being created and collected by citizens, communities, private companies, which has the same dignity of government data to support participation?
  • How can government agencies collaborate unless there is a bi-directional flow of information and collaboration can take place – depending on topics and constituency – on government and citizen turf at the same time?
  • How can participation and collaboration be realized without addressing explicitly the role of government employees, and how can they play this role unless they can access external social media?

Failing to address any of the above and setting so many milestones and reporting obligations for agencies, this directive risks turning into yet another exercise in compliance.

 

Filed under  //   government 2.0   opinions and analyses   transparency in government  

Comments [0]

Steven Aftergood: Open Government Directive a Unilateral Effort; May Encounter Resistance

Significantly, the new open government policy directive did not emerge from the exercise of “checks and balances” by the other branches of government.  Congress did not urge the Administration to promote a culture of openness, much less compel its adoption.  Instead, it is a unilateral executive branch effort, akin in its conception to Energy Secretary Hazel O’Leary’s landmark Openness Initiative of the 1990s, but now extended for the first time to the entire executive branch.

Success is not guaranteed.

The previous Administration used to invoke the theory of “the unitary executive,” which generally holds that all executive branch power and authority is vested in the President.  But the opposite may be closer to the real state of affairs, in the sense that the exercise of presidential authority is dependent on innumerable acts of compliance by scattered officials any of whom can, whether through disobedience or incompetence, frustrate the implementation of policy.  And the more ambitious the proposed change, the more likely it is to encounter resistance.

Filed under  //   government 2.0   opinion and analysis   transparency in government  

Comments [0]

Andrea DiMaio: US Open Government Directive is Disappointing

The suggested components of the Open Government Plan are skewed toward supporting transparency, for which a lot of detail is provided. However also the sections on to participation and collaboration confirm what I have called several times the “asymmetry of government 2.0”, i.e. the fact that governments take a one-way approach only to government 2.0 (data from government to citizens and engagement from citizens to government), losing sight that that information and engagement flow in the opposite direction too (information is created elsewhere that government need to be aware of, and government employees engage with external communities).

It is quite clear that the suggested approach is for agencies to address participation and collaboration on their turf and on their terms.

Also when external collaboration is mentioned [...] it refers to a type of codified, institutional collaboration that has little to do with the spontaneity of “general citizen” communities. (see interesting debate on citizen participation)

For sure, this directive will make social software vendors happy, as it will require agencies to consider some of their tools to support the requirement for participation and collaboration.  But, in doing so, the US government just perpetuates the asymmetry of government 2.0.

 

Filed under  //   government 2.0   open source clippings   opinions and analysis  

Comments [0]

Open Government Directive Link Round-up

Comments [0]

PDF: Final Open Government Directive

Click here to download:
open-govt-directive.pdf (80 KB)

Sent to Bob Edgar from White House Office

Filed under  //   government 2.0   open government   white house memos  

Comments [0]